Judge Philosophies

Alexander Johnson - Grants Pass

n/a


Alicia Romo - Grants Pass

n/a


Ann Willing - Grants Pass

n/a


Anna Willing - Grants Pass

n/a


Ben Knobel - Coquille

n/a


Bo Alderton - Grants Pass

n/a


Bob Putney - Grants Pass

n/a


Brad Berdelman - South Medford

n/a


Brian Hampton - Marshfield HS

n/a


Caroline Campbell - South Medford

n/a


Catherine Hampton - Marshfield HS

n/a


Celia Johnson - NMHS

n/a


Coleman Antintcie - Grants Pass

n/a


Colton Duval - Grants Pass

n/a


Coz Costintino - Grants Pass

n/a


Cyndi Fortuna - Grants Pass

n/a


Danielle Atkinson - South Medford

n/a


David Wood - Grants Pass

n/a


Dennis Will - Grants Pass

n/a


Deonne Wright - Grants Pass

n/a


Diana Traylor - Grants Pass

n/a


Diane Frank - Bandon HS

n/a


Ellen Howard - Bandon HS

n/a


Emily Madden - Grants Pass

n/a


Frank Mukaida - Marshfield HS

n/a


Grace Warner - South Medford

n/a


Heather Woodruff - N Val

n/a


Jana Jordaan - South Medford

n/a


Janet Capetty - Grants Pass

n/a


Jennifer Wagner - IVHS

n/a


Jennifer Roberts - Grants Pass

n/a


Jim Whittington - South Medford

n/a


Joanne Costintino - Grants Pass

n/a


Jody Thomas - Grants Pass

n/a


John Stump - Cleveland


John Atkins - Grants Pass

n/a


John Jessup - Grants Pass

n/a


Josh Scheirman - Marshfield HS

n/a


Julie Hagstrom - South Medford

n/a


Kalin Cross - South Medford

n/a


Kara Blake - Butte Falls

n/a


Katherine Hernandez - South Medford

n/a


Kayla Crook - Marshfield HS

n/a


Keith Eddins - Oak Hill

<p>I prefer and default to a policymaker paradigm in CX policy debate. &nbsp;In current jargon, I reside in the truth-over-tech world. &nbsp;That said, I try to evaluate the round from (almost) any framework on which the debaters agree. &nbsp;If they cannot or do not agree, I will do my best to adjudicate the framework issue, as well, based on the arguments presented in the round. Regardless, I believe AFF cases should have a plan, not just a generalized statement of intent. &nbsp;I still consider inherency an issue that must be addressed by the AFF, and I think solvency should be demonstrated in the 1AC. &nbsp;In my mind, the notion of presumption favoring the status quo (and, thus, the NEG) continues to exist. &nbsp;That said, if AFF presents a prima facie case and NEG chooses not to contest it, presumption essentially shifts to AFF, and NEG better have some pretty persuasive off-case positions. &nbsp;I am liberal on T (at least from an affirmative perspective). &nbsp;But if NEG presents a strong T argument that AFF fails to rebut effectively, I will treat T as an a priori voting issue. In NEG terms, a well-constructed, logical, evidence-based DISAD remains the most persuasive argument against an AFF plan. &nbsp;It need not result in nuclear war or the end of the world. &nbsp;In fact, I find most DISADs more persuasive when not taken to the ultimate extreme. &nbsp;Ks are fine arguments provided you really understand and explain them. &nbsp;But you need to present them in terms I can understand; while I know my Marx, Engels, and Lenin quite well, I would never even pretend to comprehend French post-modernist philosophy (to use one example). &nbsp;CPs should offer sufficient detail to be fully evaluated and include evidence-based solvency arguments. As for other forms of debate, I will gladly evaluate an LD round from either a value or policy perspective depending on the nature of the resolution and the results of any framework debate. &nbsp;Plans, Ks, and CPs are fine in LD. &nbsp;In Parli, I am also quite comfortable with plans, Ks, and CPs, but they are not necessary. &nbsp;However, I will discount arguments in Parli that are based on a gross factual misstatement (even if the other team fails to challenge it). &nbsp;In Public Forum, I am looking for solid evidence-based argumentation and real clash (too often the clash is missing in PF debate). In each of these forms of debate I am a flow judge. &nbsp;But for me to flow your arguments effectively, I need good signposting and clearly stated tag lines. &nbsp;Remember: I neither receive nor do I want a flashed version of your speech. &nbsp;Your best arguments may prove meaningless if you fail to tell me where to record them on the flow.</p>


Lana Tolls - Grants Pass

n/a


Lana Toll - Grants Pass

n/a


Lance Haberly - Siuslaw High

n/a


Laurie Putney - Grants Pass

n/a


Luke Kuydendall - Butte Falls

n/a


Lydia Casas - Marshfield HS

n/a


Marina Whitchurch - Grants Pass

n/a


Mark Stueve - Marshfield HS

n/a


Matthew Eldridge - Butte Falls

n/a


Matthew Parker - South Medford

n/a


Melodie Martz - N Val

n/a


Miles Stirewalt - Willamette

n/a


Nichole Barber - NMHS

n/a


Nick Davis - Grants Pass

n/a


Nick Gragg - N Val

n/a


Pam Hardy - Grants Pass

n/a


Patrick Gonzales - Cleveland


Paul Fairman - N Val

n/a


Ronnie Kendrick - Grants Pass

n/a


Stephanie Wilson - Grants Pass

n/a


Tammy Tomlinson - Grants Pass

n/a


Tracy Wilhelm - Grants Pass

n/a


Tracy Muday - Marshfield HS

n/a


Tyler Curtis - Bandon HS

n/a


Virginia Richardson - Grants Pass

n/a