Judge Philosophies

Alberto Rincon - Wilson

n/a


Allison Quarles - RPHS

n/a


Ameena Amdahl-Mason - Clackamas

<p>I competed in policy debate in high school, APDA in college, and I have been coaching all forms of debate, but primarily parliamentary, policy, and LD, since 2001. To me, your jobs as debaters is&nbsp;want to provide me with compelling reasons why you should win the debate, including organized refutations and voting issues in your final speech. I keep a rigorous flow, so organization, including a clear organizational system of lettering or numbering is important. Line-by-line refutation as well as overviews and underviews can provide clarity to the debate.</p> <p>CX: &nbsp;I would consider myself a tabula rasa judge, as much as that is possible. I feel comfortable with any line of argumentation, including theory and kritiks. However, I do not appreciate rudeness, including cursing, either between or among teams. Generic argumentation, weak links, and time sucks are not appreciated. I enjoy judging policy, especially when new and interesting ideas enter the debate.</p> <p>LD:&nbsp;I feel comfortable with any line of argumentation, as long as it clearly linked to the topic being debated. I prefer philosophical argumentation in LD, rather than more policy style argumentation. However, I do judge a lot of policy debate, so I am capable of evaluating a policy oriented round.</p> <p>Parli:&nbsp;&nbsp;I will evaluate what I hear in the round, not what I wish I had heard, so if there are things that need to be pointed out as fallacies, etc., please do so. I am not a fan of topicality/definitional debates in parli, unless the affirmative&#39;s definition is extremely skewed.</p> <p>PF: I don&#39;t flow PF, because I don&#39;t believe it is intended to be flowed in the same way as other debates. Otherwise, everything above applies.</p>


Angel Horta - Sandy

n/a


Ashley Versteeg - Silverton

n/a


Benjamin Agre - Cleveland


Blanchet Parent - Blanchet HS

n/a


Briana Mendenhall - Silverton

n/a


Cameron Nilles - OES

n/a


Carrie Strecker - Neah-Kah-Nie

n/a


Cary Doyle - Corvallis

n/a


Catie Easter - Barlow

n/a


Christopher Keller - Liberty HS

n/a


Cristian Boanca - Centennial

n/a


Daniel Shelton - Centennial

n/a


Darren Graybehl - Barlow

n/a


Dave Schaefer - Nestucca

n/a


David Barringer - OCHS

n/a


Don Steiner - Wilson


Eli Morgan-Steiner - Wilson


Eric Abbruzzese - Lincoln


Erick Lee - SAHS

n/a


James Jeffery-West - Madison

n/a


Jen Card - Barlow

n/a


Jennifer LeSieur - Clackamas


Jerry Dobesh - Centennial

n/a


Julie Solomon - OES

n/a


June Gerst - Century

n/a


Karen Cunningham - Barlow

n/a


Katie Kantrowitz - Silverton

n/a


Kelly Court - SW Christian

<p>Debate: I want to be able to flow your debate.&nbsp; Speak clearly and not too fast.&nbsp; If I can&#39;t keep up with you, you will not win.&nbsp; Make sure to state your contentions clearly at the beginning and again as you move from point to point.&nbsp; Be polite.&nbsp; Pay attention while your opponents are speaking.&nbsp; I like a clean well organized debate.&nbsp; Have fun.</p> <p>Individual Events: Tournaments make for long days; I like to learn new things and to be entertained.&nbsp; Please refrain from swearing in your presentations. It is seldom necessary.&nbsp; I look forward to judging again this year.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>


Kelsey Long - Madison

n/a


Ken Teschner - Tigard

n/a


Kjersti Sanders - Sandy

n/a


Kris Igawa - Beaverton

n/a


Krishna Malladi - Westview


Lisa Stewart - SW Christian

n/a


MIchael Grainey - Blanchet HS

n/a


Meena Mishra - Westview


Michael Doran - La Salle Prep

n/a


Michael Theofelis - DDHS

n/a


Michael Timmons - Silverton

n/a


Michelle Bracy - Centennial

n/a


Mike Witteman - OES

n/a


Padma Akkaraju - Crescent Valley


Pamela Bacon - Liberty HS

n/a


Patrick Johnson - Westview

<p>Real world arguments win- theoretical/improbable impacts do not</p> <p>Comparative impacts critical for a win</p> <p>Topicality is legit, again, only for real world probability</p> <p>CLASH! and signpost where your arguments clash with opponents AND why your impact is more significant</p> <p>No tagteam when prohibited</p> <p>Speed is not your friend when I&#39;m judging, if you have firmly established your contentions and have time, then spreading ok w/o speed</p>


Patrick Leahy - SAHS

n/a


Paul Altotsky - Tigard

n/a


Peter Sprengelmeyer - South


Rachel Thompson - OCHS

n/a


Ramnath Devulapalli - Westview


Rod Seigler - Centennial

n/a


Sally Worthy - Barlow

n/a


Selena Breazile - Neah-Kah-Nie

n/a


Shawn Hampton - CLHS

n/a


Stephen McClanahan - Silverton

n/a


Steve Root - La Salle Prep

n/a


Steve Barth - Marist

n/a


Steve Barth - JCHS

n/a


Stewart Reed - Southridge

n/a


Tom Lininger - Springfield

n/a


Tom Lininger - South

<p>Run anything. &nbsp;I am a flow judge. &nbsp;Speed is fine. &nbsp;Have fun and don&#39;t be rude.&nbsp;</p> <p>I have taught&nbsp;debate and other subjects (mostly law) at the University of Oregon. &nbsp;I used to be a policy debater back in the day.</p>


Trent Stewart - SW Christian

n/a


Ty Russell - Sandy

n/a


Vijay Chand - Westview


Yanwen Chen - Southridge

n/a