Judge Philosophies
Brielle Surgener - SMCHS
n/a
Charles Orthman - SMCHS
n/a
Chloe Han - IVC
n/a
Diego Victoria - IVC
n/a
Diya Surana - SMCHS
n/a
Dorsa Khatibloo - SMCHS
n/a
Emma Gomez - SMCHS
n/a
Erika Santos - MLA
n/a
Harrison Martin - IVC
n/a
Irene Chung - MLA
n/a
Kayleigh Winsor - SMCHS
n/a
Liam Dowd - SMCHS
n/a
May Tan - IVC
n/a
Niko Haddad - SMCHS
n/a
Raphael Bartolome - IVC
n/a
Sam Semcheshen - Honor Academy
n/a
Sofia Combel - SMCHS
n/a
Vincent Woo - IVC
n/a
Zihad Amin - IVC
Judging Philosophy
2 year community college debater. Competed at state and nationals. Open to everything. Prefer to see debate centered around the resolution. Will flow critiques, but need to make sure the link is clear and strong. Be respectful to your opponents. Partner to partner communication is acceptable, but do not speak for your partner. Will only flow what the primary speaker is saying, nothing that the partner says will be flowed. I have a hearing disability so try not to speak too fast and be clear. Extremely important to be clear so I can get as much of the argument as possible. Will default to judging rounds based on net benefits unless am told otherwise. Really enjoy impact calculus and the round will heavily be weighed on which side provides the clearest and most powerful impacts. I am willing to answer any specific questions debaters may have prior to the round