Judge Philosophies
AJ Wilkens - Nampa
n/a
Carol Mugurtio - BK
n/a
Carol Obenouer - Vallivue
n/a
Carolyn Lea - Vallivue
n/a
Cathie Knapp - Centennial
n/a
Cheryl Sutherland - Mtn. View (ID)
n/a
Dale Cluff - EHS
Dalton Hellman - Weiser ID HS
n/a
Darci Peterson - Weiser ID HS
n/a
Debbie Juola - Rocky HS
n/a
Devon Downey - Columbia
n/a
Ed Bowman - EHS
Erica Chalkus - EHS
Georegann Michell - Centennial
n/a
Grant McFarland - Columbia
n/a
Greg Carson - Skyview
n/a
Heather Luff - Vallivue
n/a
Janel Morrison - Nampa
n/a
Jeanine Rueb - Mtn. View (ID)
n/a
Jennifer Johnson-Waskow - Skyview
n/a
Jessica Page - Columbia
n/a
Jessica Wardwell - Caldwell
n/a
Jesska Pipken - Mtn. View (ID)
n/a
Jim Stutzman - BK
n/a
Joan Miller - Centennial
Joey Hale - Skyview
n/a
John Carr - Kuna
n/a
Jon Agnew - Weiser ID HS
n/a
Julie Hall - Nampa
n/a
Kat Ashcraft - Mtn. View (ID)
n/a
Katie Doi - MHS
n/a
Kelliey Chavez - EHS
<p>I am a communications Lincoln-Douglas judge who likes things in black and white. The debater needs to basically spell it out for me. I like Value to Value and Criterion to Criterion Clash as well as voters. I do not like critiques. I like a steady stream of dialogue but I do not like fast speaking like a policy debate. If I can't follow and do a flow then your arguments will mean nothing to me.<br /> </p>
Kelly Reed - EHS
Kristina Wood - EHS
Linda Shirley - BK
n/a
Margo Kelly - Columbia
n/a
Maria Barnack - EHS
Mary Ersland - EHS
Meghan McDonagh - Centennial
Mikki Mosell - EHS
Nate Strawser - Columbia
n/a
Patricia Rose - Kuna
n/a
Paula Reyes - Vallivue
n/a
Peter Thimm - BK
n/a
Randy Barnack - EHS
Robert Gordon - EHS
<p>This is my 5th year judging policy debate I will go through each<br /> argument seperately so that you know exactly what I like.<br /> <br /> General:<br /> I am a flow judge. I usually just go off of the flow and if you are<br /> able to articulate the arguments to me. I tend to lean more policy<br /> maker however seeing as how those are usually the arguments that<br /> people are able to explain to me better. Speed it ok with me but go<br /> slow on the tag lines and author so that I can flow them the rest you<br /> can speed through that is for your opponents not me.<br /> <br /> Aff:<br /> I do not have a whole lot of experience with performance aff’s. If you<br /> are going to run one be sure to articulate why I should vote for you<br /> and why the performance is relevant. Aff’s with kritikal advantages<br /> are fine but yet again impact calc it out and explain why.<br /> <br /> DA’s:<br /> Obviously couldn’t have policy without them as long as you can impact<br /> calc them out I will vote on them. I will go off the flow here if you<br /> can prove it and the other team doesn’t attack it then it goes<br /> conceded.<br /> <br /> CP’s:<br /> PIC’s are fine. And really anything here is fine I am not to picky. I<br /> love a good CP that can tie in the DA’s and give an alternate to just<br /> full out rejecting the aff.<br /> <br /> Kritik’s:<br /> I am fine with these however explain them to me. Just because you use<br /> 13 syllable words does not mean you are going to win. You have to<br /> explain to me the world of the alternative; ie. What happens after we<br /> reject this one instance of capitalism. Be sure you explain it to me.<br /> I see to many K teams running huge words in their K that they don’t<br /> even know. THAT WILL NOT WIN YOU THE BALLOT! Impact calc again and<br /> line by line<br /> <br /> Topicality:<br /> I have a high threshold for T. Unless it is obvious don’t run it. I am<br /> fine if you use T as a gateway issue but if that’s the case and they<br /> give you your links don’t carry it into the 2NR. There has to be real<br /> abuse I do not vote on potential abuse!<br /> <br /> Theory:<br /> See T.<br /> <br /> Framework:<br /> Again as long as you win the flow and tell me why to prefer yours<br /> </p>
Rose Regner - EHS
Ryan Schulz - Rocky HS
n/a
Shannon London - EHS
Tim Sullivan - Columbia
n/a