Judge Philosophies
Alexandria Lombardi - UCSD
n/a
Carter Castillo - UCSD
n/a
David Cordier - UCSD
n/a
Elizabeth Luchinski - UCSD
n/a
Felip Gerdes - UCSD
n/a
Hanna Serykava - UCSD
n/a
Indira Iyer - UCSD
n/a
Jared Hoffart - UCSD
n/a
Jasmine Moheb - UCSD
Hey everyone, my name is Jasmine (she/her/her's) and I come from four yeas of high school experience mainly in Congressional Debate (I competed at district and national level, CHSSA state, and was a finalist at the 2018 TOC) and am now entering my third year in collegiate debate. In college, I compete in the NPDA (parliamentary debate with more tech)/IPDA/BP formats so I am well-versed in everything from technical debate to more lay, rhetoric-heavy debate. I have been coaching debate for six years now and judging for three years, most recently at the 2020 NSDA nationals. I do not like/cannot follow *extreme* spreading, so please avoid doing that if I am judging a policy round. Overall, I look for well-articulated arguments with clear and coherent links as well as concrete impacts. Unique contentions are always a plus. It is very important in Congress to show to me that you are interacting with the round if you are one of the later speakers; clash is appreciated. In other debates, I would consider myself to be a flow judge, so organization and clarity is critical. I am also familiar with and have judged all speech events and there is less of a paradigm I can give for that because everyone is so different, just enjoy your time in speech and debate and performing! Best of luck to everyone!
Jason Foster - UCSD
n/a
Jiayi Hu - UCSD
n/a
Joey Wang - UCSD
n/a
Kaitlyn Chin - UCSD
n/a
Khushi Kumar - UCSD
n/a
Michael Wagreich - UCSD
n/a
Mitra Sutar - UCSD
n/a
Nam Nguyen - UCSD
n/a
Sam Hwang - UCSD
n/a
Santiago Reyes - UCSD
n/a
Taylor Brough - UCSD
n/a