Judge Philosophies

Audrey Umber - Canby

n/a


Caron Newman - Loggers

<p>I am first and foremost a communications judge. &nbsp;That means that eye contact, respect for your opponent while he/she is speaking - not talking to your partner (to me, that is rude), inflection, and rate of speech are important. &nbsp;Regardless of the type of debate, you must be clear and concise. &nbsp;I do not like spreading; what&rsquo;s the point if no one can understand you? &nbsp;Remember, Aff must convince me there needs to be a change in CX. &nbsp;I don&rsquo;t appreciate the neg wasting time on T if it&rsquo;s not really an issue. &nbsp;The worst round I&rsquo;ve ever judged spent 20 minutes arguing the definition of &ldquo;its.&rdquo; &nbsp;If you are not arguing the resolution, it&rsquo;s very difficult for me to vote for you. &nbsp;For LD, I enjoy the philosophical portion as that was my minor in college. Try to stay away from policy jargon in LD; it doesn&rsquo;t fit. For parli, I expect you to answer questions instead of avoiding them and filling time that could be better spent responding to your opponent. &nbsp;Finally, in all events, the cross weighs heavily in my decision-making. &nbsp;I appreciate insightful questioning and clear answers.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>


Cassie Passon - OCHS

n/a


Darren Dirk - North Bend

n/a


Dave Schaefer - Nestucca

n/a


Don Steiner - Wilson


Elaine Tuchten - OCHS

n/a


Jennifer Conner - Forest Grove

n/a


Jo Meskel - OCHS

n/a


Josh Scheirman - North Bend

n/a


Kat Podlesnik - Hermiston

n/a


Kelli McMellon - Nestucca

n/a


Kenneth Bisbee - Ridgefield H.S.

n/a


Kerry Cakebread - Wilson

n/a


Madie Hurst - OCHS

n/a


Tiffany Daggett - Nestucca

n/a