2010 Silverton Invitational
Silverton High School - Nov 6 | Status: Completed
Judge Philosophies
zz-bye
n/a
Afina Neunzert - Tigard
n/a
Alex DeBruyne - Tigard
n/a
Allison Faherty - WHS
n/a
Allison Quarles - RPHS
n/a
Alma Baxter - Nestucca
n/a
Ameena Amdahl-Mason - Clackamas
<p>I competed in policy debate in high school, APDA in college, and I have been coaching all forms of debate, but primarily parliamentary, policy, and LD, since 2001. To me, your jobs as debaters is want to provide me with compelling reasons why you should win the debate, including organized refutations and voting issues in your final speech. I keep a rigorous flow, so organization, including a clear organizational system of lettering or numbering is important. Line-by-line refutation as well as overviews and underviews can provide clarity to the debate.</p> <p>CX: I would consider myself a tabula rasa judge, as much as that is possible. I feel comfortable with any line of argumentation, including theory and kritiks. However, I do not appreciate rudeness, including cursing, either between or among teams. Generic argumentation, weak links, and time sucks are not appreciated. I enjoy judging policy, especially when new and interesting ideas enter the debate.</p> <p>LD: I feel comfortable with any line of argumentation, as long as it clearly linked to the topic being debated. I prefer philosophical argumentation in LD, rather than more policy style argumentation. However, I do judge a lot of policy debate, so I am capable of evaluating a policy oriented round.</p> <p>Parli: I will evaluate what I hear in the round, not what I wish I had heard, so if there are things that need to be pointed out as fallacies, etc., please do so. I am not a fan of topicality/definitional debates in parli, unless the affirmative's definition is extremely skewed.</p> <p>PF: I don't flow PF, because I don't believe it is intended to be flowed in the same way as other debates. Otherwise, everything above applies.</p>
Amy Meabe - WHS
n/a
Anita Reddy - LOHS
n/a
April Bauguess - Roseburg
n/a
Carol Rentschler - LHS
n/a
Casey Wang - Cleveland
Doug McDonald - Summit
n/a
Drew Bauguess - Roseburg
n/a
Elie Adelman - Cleveland
Eric Fromm - Canby
n/a
Ethan Adelman-Sil - Cleveland
Gabe Pagano - Summit
n/a
Gena Dwyer - North
n/a
Glenn Graham - Southridge
n/a
Jackie Floyd - Nestucca
n/a
Jeff Zhu - Westview
Jeff Edelson - LHS
n/a
Jennifer Gruter - Clackamas
Jenny Owen - WHS
n/a
Jessica Horton - Neah-Kah-Nie
n/a
June Gerst - Century
n/a
Justin Lindemann - Woodburn
n/a
Kathleen Serven - Nestucca
n/a
Katy Walker - Century
n/a
Kelli McMellon - Nestucca
n/a
Kiefer Versteegh - SAHS
n/a
Lea Woods - Cleveland
Leslie Kowash - Cleveland
MIchael Grainey - Blanchet HS
n/a
Matt Hurliman - Nestucca
n/a
Matt Compton - Tigard
n/a
Melissa Lowry Sullivan - Southridge
n/a
Michelle Floyd - Nestucca
n/a
Mike Baranow - WHS
n/a
Natalie Goben - Canby
n/a
Patrick Leahy - SAHS
n/a
Patrick Johnson - Westview
<p>Real world arguments win- theoretical/improbable impacts do not</p> <p>Comparative impacts critical for a win</p> <p>Topicality is legit, again, only for real world probability</p> <p>CLASH! and signpost where your arguments clash with opponents AND why your impact is more significant</p> <p>No tagteam when prohibited</p> <p>Speed is not your friend when I'm judging, if you have firmly established your contentions and have time, then spreading ok w/o speed</p>
Patrick Gonzales - Cleveland
Peir Chu - Westview
Rick Morton - Neah-Kah-Nie
n/a
Ronit Zusman - LHS
n/a
Sam Sanchez - Southridge
n/a
Susan Wilderman - McKay
n/a
Tara Urner - Cleveland
Tarin Schalow - WHS
n/a