2010 Sam Barlow High School Invitational
Sam Barlow High School - Oct 9 | Status: Completed
Judge Philosophies
Aelx Boyd - Cleveland
n/a
Afina Neunzert - Tigard
n/a
Alex DeBruyne - Tigard
n/a
Allison Quarles - RPHS
n/a
Allison Faherty - WHS
n/a
Ameena Amdahl-Mason - Clackamas
<p>I competed in policy debate in high school, APDA in college, and I have been coaching all forms of debate, but primarily parliamentary, policy, and LD, since 2001. To me, your jobs as debaters is want to provide me with compelling reasons why you should win the debate, including organized refutations and voting issues in your final speech. I keep a rigorous flow, so organization, including a clear organizational system of lettering or numbering is important. Line-by-line refutation as well as overviews and underviews can provide clarity to the debate.</p> <p>CX: I would consider myself a tabula rasa judge, as much as that is possible. I feel comfortable with any line of argumentation, including theory and kritiks. However, I do not appreciate rudeness, including cursing, either between or among teams. Generic argumentation, weak links, and time sucks are not appreciated. I enjoy judging policy, especially when new and interesting ideas enter the debate.</p> <p>LD: I feel comfortable with any line of argumentation, as long as it clearly linked to the topic being debated. I prefer philosophical argumentation in LD, rather than more policy style argumentation. However, I do judge a lot of policy debate, so I am capable of evaluating a policy oriented round.</p> <p>Parli: I will evaluate what I hear in the round, not what I wish I had heard, so if there are things that need to be pointed out as fallacies, etc., please do so. I am not a fan of topicality/definitional debates in parli, unless the affirmative's definition is extremely skewed.</p> <p>PF: I don't flow PF, because I don't believe it is intended to be flowed in the same way as other debates. Otherwise, everything above applies.</p>
Andrew Riley - Madison
n/a
Bart Millar - LHS
n/a
Brett Condron - Westview
Brian Hutwagner - Cleveland
n/a
Brittany Johnson - Centennial
n/a
Caitland Hooper-Grim - Centennial
n/a
Chad Pettingill - Centennial
n/a
Cheryl Lambert - Centennial
n/a
Chris Wang - Madison
n/a
Cleveland Ten - Cleveland
n/a
Cleveland Eleven - Cleveland
n/a
Conner Vilhauer - Madison
n/a
Dennise Larson - Hermiston
n/a
Dwight Siewart - Westview
n/a
Elie Adelman - Cleveland
Erin Tillery - Madison
n/a
Farryal Siddiqui - LOHS
n/a
Harmant Pandarpurkar - Westview
Jason Miller - Glencoe
n/a
Jen Loeung - Centennial
n/a
Jennifer Gruter - Clackamas
Jessica Horton - Neah-Kah-Nie
n/a
Jessica Cook - LHS
n/a
Jim Raible - Ione
n/a
John Larson - Hermiston
n/a
Julie Siewart - Westview
n/a
Julie Colvin - Westview
June Gerst - Century
n/a
Justin Wyle - Gresham
n/a
Kathryn Schelonka - LOHS
n/a
Katy Walker - Century
n/a
Leslie Kowash - Cleveland
Liz Turner - Forest Grove
n/a
Mary Kay West - Cleveland
Matt Fisher - Westview
n/a
Matt Compton - Tigard
n/a
Merlin Benneth - Madison
n/a
Michael Belcher - S. Eugene
n/a
Natalie Goben - Canby
n/a
Owen Zahorcak - S. Eugene
n/a
Patrick Johnson - Westview
<p>Real world arguments win- theoretical/improbable impacts do not</p> <p>Comparative impacts critical for a win</p> <p>Topicality is legit, again, only for real world probability</p> <p>CLASH! and signpost where your arguments clash with opponents AND why your impact is more significant</p> <p>No tagteam when prohibited</p> <p>Speed is not your friend when I'm judging, if you have firmly established your contentions and have time, then spreading ok w/o speed</p>
Patrick Gonzales - Cleveland
Penny Neil - Westview
n/a
Rick Morton - Neah-Kah-Nie
n/a
Sam Bennet - Cleveland
n/a
Sam Gotur - Centennial
n/a
Sanjana Kapur - Westview
Shanwei Cen - Westview
n/a
Stephen Rouffy - Gresham
n/a
Susan McLain - Glencoe
n/a
Taj Suleyman - Madison
n/a
Tom Murphy - Centennial
n/a