Judge Philosophies
Arden Kelly - Tallahassee
My background is deeply rooted in the theatre as a professional actor, now director and professor. I coach for an award winning college forensics team in individual events. In a good debate candidate, I look for clarity of thought and driving through your thoughts to reach your point/argument. I also come to each round without bias towards a certain subject with the need for the winner to convince me with facts that outweigh the other competitor. It is very important to have passion in your fight for your side, as well.
Elizabeth Blair - Tallahassee
n/a
Joan Andrews - TJC
Not listed as a Judge for this year.
M'Liss Hindman - TJC
In judging debate, I am open to most arguments. However, I am a strong believer in civility and want to hear debaters making rational arguments without bashing or demeaning their opponents. I also like to hear clear organization with links to one another's arguments. I do not enjoy speed or excessive use of jargon. I believe debate should still be a communication event teaching solid communication skills that can be used in everyday life.
Marjorie Sparrow - DMC
IPDA:
IPDA is a layman’s debate and not to be filled with LD jargon. I appreciate logic over emotional appeal. I enjoy creative arguments using solid logic and common sense. Do not speed talk. If I can’t hear or understand what you have said, that in no way helps the argumentation. I love layman’s debate. I believe this skill will serve you for the entirety of your life. The most organized, research driven and logical argument wins the debate.
NPDA:
Use of jargon is acceptable here. Basically the same philosophy as IPDA. Once again, watch your speed when talking.
Sarah Contreras - DMC
Interp Events: I want to BELIEVE that you have embodied your character. I do not want simply words on a page. I like a piece with emotional levels. There is nothing better than making me laugh just at the moment I am about to cry! Your piece should have social significance. You can set that up in your introduction. Take me on an emotional rollercoaster! Have fun!
Debate: I value a coherent, well-organized argument. I want to be able to flow the round easily so that I can concentrate on what you are telling me rather than what I am writing down. I like a friendly clash...clash is good but does not have to be nasty. However, do not be fake either. I am NOT impressed by the use of debate jargon. I believe the best argument would be able to convince any person on the street and they dont know or care about debate jargon.