2016 NIET DISTRICT 2 Qualifier
Oregon State University - Feb 20 | Status: Completed
Judge Philosophies
Andrea Baber - NCU
n/a
Colten Sullivent - Lower Columbia
<p>Though my background is principally in IPDA and I place a high value on communicative style, over time I have come to appreciate the structure and clarity of Parliamentary style debate. That said, there are a few things that are easily stated and understood about my judging philosophy.</p> <p> </p> <p>Speed is not a rhetorical virtue. It serves only to confound those who would find the most value in clarity. It is to be avoided.</p> <p> </p> <p>Decorum is paramount. Competitors must remain polite throughout the event lest they see their speaker points drop. What’s more, decorum extends beyond behavior in round. Competitors should appear professional and well groomed.</p> <p> </p> <p>Procedural arguments made for their own sake are tedious. Topicality, critiques, and similar arguments must be well supported and reasoned.</p> <p> </p> <p>Otherwise, standard expectations apply. Road mapping and signposting are appreciated. Arguments should be well impacted. Be polite and professional. And have fun. Debate should be an enjoyable experience!</p> <p> </p>
Jackson Miller - Linfield
n/a
Jennifer Conner - Pacific
n/a
Krista Simonis - UP
Leah Moore - Lower Columbia
Lilly Huynh - Pacific
n/a
Liz Kinnaman - Clark CC
n/a
Marcy Halpin - LCSC
n/a
Richie Laursen - Clark CC
n/a
Robi Mahan - Lewis & Clark
Ryan Tinlin - Lewis & Clark
Valerie Schiller - UP
n/a