Judge Philosophies

Alex DeBruyne - Tigard

n/a


Allison Quarles - RPHS

n/a


Ameena Amdahl-Mason - Clackamas

<p>I competed in policy debate in high school, APDA in college, and I have been coaching all forms of debate, but primarily parliamentary, policy, and LD, since 2001. To me, your jobs as debaters is&nbsp;want to provide me with compelling reasons why you should win the debate, including organized refutations and voting issues in your final speech. I keep a rigorous flow, so organization, including a clear organizational system of lettering or numbering is important. Line-by-line refutation as well as overviews and underviews can provide clarity to the debate.</p> <p>CX: &nbsp;I would consider myself a tabula rasa judge, as much as that is possible. I feel comfortable with any line of argumentation, including theory and kritiks. However, I do not appreciate rudeness, including cursing, either between or among teams. Generic argumentation, weak links, and time sucks are not appreciated. I enjoy judging policy, especially when new and interesting ideas enter the debate.</p> <p>LD:&nbsp;I feel comfortable with any line of argumentation, as long as it clearly linked to the topic being debated. I prefer philosophical argumentation in LD, rather than more policy style argumentation. However, I do judge a lot of policy debate, so I am capable of evaluating a policy oriented round.</p> <p>Parli:&nbsp;&nbsp;I will evaluate what I hear in the round, not what I wish I had heard, so if there are things that need to be pointed out as fallacies, etc., please do so. I am not a fan of topicality/definitional debates in parli, unless the affirmative&#39;s definition is extremely skewed.</p> <p>PF: I don&#39;t flow PF, because I don&#39;t believe it is intended to be flowed in the same way as other debates. Otherwise, everything above applies.</p>


Andrea Kenagy - Nestucca

n/a


Ashley Leap - RPHS

n/a


Benjamin Agre - Cleveland


Betsy Tighe - Cleveland


Brett Hurliman - Tillamook

n/a


Brian Gutowski - West Linn


Carrie Strecker - NKHS

n/a


Celina Patterson - Cleveland

n/a


Chaim Sil - Cleveland


Daria Colner - Cleveland


Dave Schaefer - Nestucca

n/a


Derek Bruey-Finck - West

n/a


Don Steiner - WHS

n/a


Elie Adelman - Cleveland


Elizabeth Custer - Gresham

n/a


Fred Gordon - Cleveland


Geary Linhart - Veritas School

n/a


Gena Dwyer - North

n/a


Hiro Nukaga - Tigard

n/a


Ian Bisbee - Ridgefield H.S.

n/a


Jason Miller - Glencoe

n/a


Jeff Stirling - Sherwood

n/a


Jennifer Gruter - Clackamas


Jenny Wyss - Tillamook

n/a


Jenny Sasser - Cleveland


Justin Wyle - Gresham

n/a


Kenneth Bisbee - Ridgefield H.S.

n/a


Kris Igawa - Beaverton

n/a


Lance Haberly - Siuslaw High

n/a


MIchael Grainey - Blanchet HS

n/a


Matt Ogle - Silverton

n/a


Melanie Merryman - Nestucca

n/a


Melissa Kolb - OCHS

n/a


Miranda Ryan - Madison

n/a


Mr. Rodway - OCHS

n/a


Natalie Goben - Canby

n/a


Patrick Johnson - Westview

<p>Real world arguments win- theoretical/improbable impacts do not</p> <p>Comparative impacts critical for a win</p> <p>Topicality is legit, again, only for real world probability</p> <p>CLASH! and signpost where your arguments clash with opponents AND why your impact is more significant</p> <p>No tagteam when prohibited</p> <p>Speed is not your friend when I&#39;m judging, if you have firmly established your contentions and have time, then spreading ok w/o speed</p>


Patrick Gonzales - Cleveland


Patrick Leahy - SAHS

n/a


Russell Panter - Sherwood

n/a


Scott Farestrand - Cleveland


Stephen Rouffy - Gresham

n/a


Steve Barth - Marist

n/a


Susan McLain - Glencoe

n/a


Terry DeBruyne - Tigard

n/a


Usha Ramanujam - Westview


Vivek Paranjape - Sunset

n/a


Wendy Werthaiser - Ashland

n/a