2014 IVC Winter Classic
Irvine Valley College - Jan 11 | Status: Completed
Judge Philosophies
Aditya Sharma - IVC
Alex Zison - IVC
Amanda Hale - IVC
Ayden Loeffler - IVC
Brandon Flectcher - IVC
Darian Taban - IVC
David Brown - IVC
David Chavez - Nova 42
n/a
Emily Deutsch - IVC
Eric Garcia - Magnet Academy
n/a
Francisca Kho - VelasquezAcadmy
n/a
Hannah Holtman - IVC
James Coster - IVC
Jordyn Shubin - IVC
Jose Avila - IVC
Kamiran Dadah - IVC
Kelly Kehoe - IVC
Kristina Rietveld - IVC
Kyle Gallego - IVC
Lauren Gomez - IVC
Le-Rin Chen - IVC
Lucie Profenius - IVC
Luke Marvin - IVC
Marc Oiument - IVC
Matt Volz - IVC
Nick Williams - IVC
Noreen Safdar - IVC
Peter Doesburg - IVC
Philip Gohata - IVC
Samantha Sokolaw - IVC
Sarah Beydoun - IVC
Scott McKeever - Credos
n/a
Steve Kim - Magnet Academy
n/a
Steve Robertson - IVC
Syeda Jafari - IVC
Tiffani Smith - IVC
William Neesen - IVC
<h2>Bill Neesen - California State University-Long Beach</h2> <h3>Saved Philosophy:</h3> <p> </p> <p>Bill Neesen<br /> Cal. State Long Beach & Irvine Valley College<br /> <br /> Parli Debates judged this year: 40+<br /> Non-Parli Debates judged this year: Policy 10+<br /> Years Judging Debate: 15<br /> Years Competed in Debate: 7<br /> What School Competed at: Millard South/ OCC/CSU- Fullerton<br /> <br /> Making Decisions: 'My decision is based solely on how the debaters argue I should decide; I avoid using my own decision-making philosophy as much as possible. It is your round. choose how you want it to happen and then defend it.'<br /> <br /> Decision-making Approach: 'I really don t like any of the above. It is up to you and you can do whatever you want. I decide who wins based on what you say in the round. So it is up to you. '<br /> <br /> Assessing Arguments: 'I am addicted to my flow but drops only become important if you tell me they were droped and why that makes them important.'<br /> <br /> Presentational Aspects: 'Speed is ok I would be amazed if you went faster than I can flow but if your not clear that might happen. I hate offensive rhetoric and if it gets bad so will your speaks. That is the one place I get to imput what I think and I love that.'<br /> <br /> Strong Viewpoints: 'No I see debate as a game. I have defended some pretty scarry shit. So I would not punish you for doing it but you better be able to defend it.'<br /> <br /> Cases, DAs, CPs, Ks, T, etc.: 'I like all of what is listed. My advice is to make some arguments and then defend them. I really don t care what they are.'<br /> <br /> Other Items to Note: 'I might have a higher threshold on T and similar args. I have also been told that I am a K hack even though I never ran them and was a CP debator. '</p> <p> </p> <p><br /> </p>