Judge Philosophies
Andy Christensen - ISU
n/a
Angie Tinker - PacificLutheran
n/a
Bethany Williams - NU
n/a
Chase Hyman - PacificLutheran
n/a
Corey Patton - SeattleU
n/a
Elizabeth Romero - NU
n/a
Greg Young - Humboldt
n/a
Hannah Bates - SeattleU
n/a
Isaac Helland - Corban
n/a
Jackson Miller - Linfield
n/a
James Elias - Gonzaga
n/a
John Nelson - ISU
n/a
John Swayne - NU
n/a
Julian Plaza - CC
Mari Carmen Noguera - Linfield
n/a
Melanie Nadon - PacificLutheran
n/a
Nicola Walters - Humboldt
n/a
Qiang Zhen - Linfield
n/a
Sarah Partlow Lefevre - ISU
<p> I have been doing NDT/CEDA policy debate since 1991. I debated for four years at the University of Utah, assistant coached for 6 years at the University of Kansas, and I have been the Director of Debate at Idaho State since 2001. I am fairly open to any type of well explained and warranted arguments. I like it when debaters provide a good meta analysis in rebuttals. I can generally flow unless you are extremely blippy and very fast. I like both policy and critical arguments. I think the debaters should debate about the rules of debate. So I am open to procedurals and framing arguments. I want the rebuttals to write my ballot for me. I also vote on defense but prefer offense. </p> <p> </p>
Shannon Scott - George Fox
n/a
Sydney Beadle - George Fox
n/a