2022 UARK's "Fayetteville Fisticuffs"
University of Arkansas - Mar 4-6 | Status: Completed | 11:40 AM Central
Tournament Time: 11:40 AM Central
Judge Philosophies
A Adams (they/them) - LSU
n/a
AJ Edwards (He/Him) - LSUS
n/a
Aaron Calhoun - BPCC
n/a
Abbi Arbuckle (she/her) - ACU
n/a
Abby Weiss - ACU
n/a
Adam Cox (he/him) - UCA
Adam Kinder - LEE
n/a
Adeline Phillips - BPCC
n/a
Alex Bope - UU
n/a
Alex Gibson - BPCC
n/a
Alexandria Ritchie - ACU
n/a
Alli Hatchet (she/her) - LSU
n/a
Alyssa Runnels - ATU
n/a
Andrew Jones - LEE
n/a
Andrews Brister - UARK
n/a
Anna Voth - ACU
n/a
Ariel Kizer (she/her) - LSU
n/a
Athena Shead - UTK
n/a
August Williams - MTSU
n/a
Austin Wilson - UU
n/a
Brook McMillan - Jeff State
n/a
Bryce Medrano - MTSU
n/a
Caleb Starkey - UU
n/a
Cameron Hodge - Jeff State
n/a
Carlos Reyes - LEE
n/a
Chuck Rogers - MSU
n/a
Colin Quinn - UNT
Colin Quinn
University of North Texas
Framing how I should evaluate things is the most important thing to do. When that doesn't happen I have to intervene more and rely more on my predispositions rather than the arguments made.
Topicality: I like T debates. I think that for the neg to win a T debate there needs to be a well established competing interpretations framework and a good limits or ground argument. Affs need to have a reasonability argument paired with a decent we meet or counter-interpretation.
Counterplans: The neg needs to establish competition and a clear net benefit. I think i'm generally aff biased although they need to focus on what they can win (Most theory arguments are reasons to reject the argument except conditionality bad, I think most condition/consult-esque counterplans are legitimate but not competitive, etc).
Disadvantages: Impact calculus should be a priority. I do not think that there's always a risk of anything and can be persuaded that there's zero risk.
Kritiks: Impact framing arguments are the most important thing to win. They filter how I evaluate the rest of the debate in terms of deciding what is important to win and what isn't. I think that negatives need to make definite choices in the 2NR in terms of how to frame the K and what to focus on otherwise the aff is in a strategic place. Link/Impact scenarios that are specific to the plan make the debate much harder for the aff.
Affs: I think that framework is useful and can be won but I am sympathetic to affs that are topical without maybe defending a resolutional agent. I think a winning framework argument should be centered around a method that encourages the best discussion about the topic rather than just the government. When negs lose framework debates they fail to win links to the aff c/i or role of the ballot arguments. Topical version arguments are useful but negs need to remember to explain the reason they solve the affs offense; "you can still talk about x" often doesn't cut it. I think that affs that don't defend a plan need to focus on framing the ballot because that's how I will filter all of their arguments. I think that it is difficult for aff's to win framework debates without a we meet or counter-interp that can frame any other offense you have in the debate.
I may not know the very specific part of the topic/argument you are going for so make sure it's explained. I'm pretty visible in terms of reactions to certain arguments and it will be obvious if i'm confused as to what is going on.
Don't cheat.
Courtney Cochran - MSU
n/a
Daisy Rehbock (She/Her) - UARK
n/a
Derek Dismukes - MTSU
n/a
Devyn Hinds (She/Her) - UARK
n/a
Edward Onisei (He/Him) - UARK
n/a
Elaine Csoros - UU
n/a
Elias Perry - LEE
n/a
Emily Landry - BPCC
n/a
Emily Youngblood - BPCC
n/a
Emma Jaramillo - LEE
n/a
Emma Catanese - Jeff State
n/a
Faith Carter (She/Her) - UARK
n/a
Faith Yoruw - LAC
n/a
Faith Kirkland - LAC
n/a
Grace Dunning - UU
n/a
Grace VanLiere (she/her) - UU
n/a
Grey Rodery - UCA
n/a
Halle Garner - UU
n/a
Hannah Voss - LAC
n/a
Hannah Dryer - UU
n/a
Isabelle Marshall - UTK
n/a
Jaci Sabatini (They/Them) - UARK
n/a
Jack Van Dyke (He/They) - UARK
n/a
Jackson Scott (he/him) - ACU
n/a
Jackson Csoma - BPCC
n/a
Jacob Goldberg - Jeff State
n/a
Jake Peace - ACU
n/a
James Jovicich - UARK
n/a
Jasmine Brossett - NSU
n/a
Jessi Boaz (she/her) - ACU
n/a
Jessica Rogers - MTSU
n/a
Jewel Thomas (She/Her) - LSUS
n/a
Jim Evans - UAMONT
n/a
Joao Souza (He/Him) - ORU
n/a
Joe Mego - MTSU
Jonny Locke - MTSU
n/a
Josiah Reed - LAC
n/a
Jovanni Arellano - LEE
n/a
KELLI KIRKLAND (she/her's) - USM
KLAUS BERRY - USM
Kale Rector (He/Him) - LSUS
n/a
Katherine Anne Thierfelder - UU
n/a
Katie Shaw - ACU
n/a
Keely Hardeman (she/her) - ACU
n/a
Kevin Doss - LSCO
n/a
Kevin Wilmoth (He/Him) - UARK
n/a
Kimberly Truong - LEE
n/a
Kylie Bennett - LAC
n/a
LSUS-Cooper Johnson - LSUS
n/a
Lauren Dial (she/her) - UARK
n/a
Lindsay Duede (she/her) - LSU
n/a
Linley Brown - LEE
n/a
Logan Martin (He/Him) - UARK
n/a
Luke Hubbard (He/Him) - UARK
n/a
Mary Rose Stepnowski - Belmont Abbey
n/a
Matheo Vergara - ACU
n/a
Maurica Simpson (she/her) - ACU
n/a
Max Green (He/Him) - UARK
n/a
Megan Dial (She/Her) - UARK
n/a
Megan Veilleux - LSUS
n/a
Mik Davis - MTSU
n/a
Mollie McLeod - ACU
n/a
Nathan Marshall - ACU
n/a
Nazif Manaj - Belmont
n/a
Nick Truitt - UU
n/a
Ocean Wang (he/him) - LSU
n/a
Olivia Shaw - UU
n/a
Patrick Richey (he/him/Dr.) - MTSU
Meh. I've judged a few rounds. I hate rudeness and disrespect in rounds. Keep it nice and cordial. Don't BS me. I like cats!!!!
Rayne Duque - BPCC
n/a
Rebecca Richey - MTSU
Dr. Who or Super Natural references!
Ruqayyah Smith - LSUS
n/a
Ruth Dismukes - Jeff State
n/a
Ryan Wagy - UU
n/a
Sahori Hernandez-Quinones (she/her) - ACU
n/a
Samuel Stettheimer - UU
n/a
Scottie Lawrence - ATU
n/a
Sean Fischser-Reagan (he/him) - UARK
n/a
Seung Ho Jeon - A-State
Sha'Mya Lorden - NSU
n/a
Stassja Campbell (She/Her) - UARK
n/a
Steven Barhorst - MTSU
Swasti Mishra - UTK
n/a
Tabitha Keylon - UU
n/a
Thaddeus Stringer - ACU
n/a
Treycin Rogers - ATU
n/a
Tyler Redmon - Belmont
n/a
Victoria Watson - LAC
n/a
Will Stanley - ACU
n/a
Wyatt Abrams - MTSU
n/a