Judge Philosophies
Danielle Jackson - Mariner
<h1>How to debate in front of me:</h1> <p><br /> </p> <h2>Speed:</h2> <p>I am generally good with very little speed! That being said, I am put off by debaters sitting down and spreading into a screen. To me that isn't what a real round should be like.<br /> <br /> </p> <h2>Framework:</h2> <p>Slow down and explain the function of your arguments and the burdens set up by your framework. I would prefer more simple, intuitive frameworks with simple burdens and intelligent analysis than complex frameworks that seek to preclude your opponent on multiple levels. <br /> <br /> </p> <h2>Theory/Topicality:</h2> <p>PLEASE NO! If your opponent is really being abusive or is genuinely not topical, go ahead, run theory or topicality, and while I will try to evaluate these debates, you will run the risk of me not completely understanding your argument.<br /> <br /> </p> <h2>Policy Arguments (Plans, CPs, Disads):</h2> <p>Don't do it!<br /> </p> <h2>Misc. Off-case Positions:</h2> <p>Nope!<br /> <br /> </p> <h2>Tricks:</h2> <p>If this is how you plan on winning my ballot, you are badly mistaken.<br /> </p> <h2>Speaker Points:</h2> <p>I give between 25 and 30. <br /> </p>
Alice Gusev - Kamiak
n/a
Angela Kim - Kamiak
n/a
Avindea Hansen - Mount Vernon
n/a
BRYCE HENSHAW - BUDC
n/a
CAROLINE CHEN - BUDC
n/a
Daniela Hodeg - Kamiak
n/a
Devin McManuss - Kamiak
n/a
HALEY REED - BUDC
n/a
HUNTER RENZ - BUDC
n/a
Harneet Grewal - Kamiak
n/a
Johnny Jeong - Kamiak
n/a
KATIE CLARKE - BUDC
n/a
Kelley Kirkpatrick - Mount Vernon
<p>I was formerly a policy debater... but now find myself mostly coaching Lincoln Douglas debate! I am open to any type of argument as long as it is clearly explained and well argued. Speed isn't normally an issue... and I do verballly let debaters know when I am finding them unclear. </p>
Natalia Munoz - Kamiak
n/a
Nicole Salama - Snohomish
n/a
Niko Battle - Mariner
<p>So I am currently a varsity LD debater for Mariner High School, and yeah.</p> <p><strong>Overview:</strong><br /> <br /> When you are debating, you are playing a game. My old coach taught me that debaters are allowed and rightfully so to play how they want; so long as they don't cheat. Yes, most of my experience lies with traditional LD arguments, however, I will vote on any argument, whether that's CP/ DA, PK, PIK, or traditional LD. </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Theory:</strong></p> <p>Not my favorite; I got my roots in good old-fashioned, southern lay debate, but if its what you like then go for it bro.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Evidence: </strong></p> <p>Please don't cite FOX "news". Ok?</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Computer Issues/ In-Round Issues</strong>:</p> <p>Don't sweat it bro if we have to stop the clock for something then we'll stop the clock.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>In-Round Behavior:</strong></p> <p>Dude just be respectful and we'll be golden. Oh, I would prefer a roadmap before you start your speeches. </p> <p><strong>If there is something that I left out here then feel free to ask me questions before the round starts. </strong><br /> </p>
Peri Kirkpatrick - Mount Vernon
n/a
Peter Kim - Kamiak
n/a
Sunny P - Kamiak
n/a
Thai-Hang Nguyen - Mariner
<h1>How to debate in front of me:</h1> <p><br /> </p> <h2>Speed:</h2> <p>I am generally good with very little speed! That being said, I am put off by debaters sitting down and spreading into a screen. To me that isn't what a real round should be like.<br /> <br /> </p> <h2>Framework:</h2> <p>Slow down and explain the function of your arguments and the burdens set up by your framework. I would prefer more simple, intuitive frameworks with simple burdens and intelligent analysis than complex frameworks that seek to preclude your opponent on multiple levels. <br /> <br /> </p> <h2>Theory/Topicality:</h2> <p>PLEASE NO! If your opponent is really being abusive or is genuinely not topical, go ahead, run theory or topicality, and while I will try to evaluate these debates, you will run the risk of me not completely understanding your argument.<br /> <br /> </p> <h2>Policy Arguments (Plans, CPs, Disads):</h2> <p>Don't do it!<br /> </p> <h2>Misc. Off-case Positions:</h2> <p>Nope!<br /> <br /> </p> <h2>Tricks:</h2> <p>If this is how you plan on winning my ballot, you are badly mistaken.<br /> </p> <h2>Speaker Points:</h2> <p>I give between 25 and 30. </p>