2013 Frolic Some More
Otterbein University - Dec 8 | Status: Completed
Judge Philosophies
Adam Key - TSU
n/a
Cory Paul Harrison - Ohio U
n/a
Darrell Farmer - UNL
n/a
David Trumble - St. A\'s
n/a
Dylan Kristufek - CMU
n/a
Emily Thieman - Miami U
n/a
Eric Bonilla - Akron
n/a
Gus Foote - Ohio U
n/a
Jack Clancy - Akron
n/a
Jeff Toney - Pacific
Jeremy Coffman - TSU
n/a
Joe Packer - CMU
n/a
John Schultz - Purdue
Justin Rudnick - Ohio U
n/a
Kaitlin Dockry - Akron
n/a
Katie Hodgdon - CMU
n/a
Kristi Scholten - Truman
n/a
Lanie Presswood - Ohio U
n/a
Marlin Bates - Pacific
<p>ection 1 – General Information</p> <p>Dr. Marlin Bates</p> <p>University of the Pacific</p> <p>Years judging LD: I judged your coaches.</p> <p>Years coaching: I coached your parents.</p> <p>Decision calculus: I will generally decide where and how I am instructed to decide by the debaters themselves. I am generally open to any arguments. However, in my old age, I have determined the following:</p> <ol> <li>This is a communication event. Communicate. Speed is discouraged. I am fully capable of flowing any speed demon. However, I choose not to. </li> <li>Cross-examination is binding & important. You should address your questions and answers to the critic, not each other.</li> <li>Be polite and have fun.</li> </ol> <p>Please begin by explaining what you think is the relevant information about your approach to judging that will best assist the debaters. Please be specific and clear. This may include your background, delivery preferences and general thoughts on paradigms (stock issues, policy maker, tabula rasa, etc).</p> <p>Section 1 – General Information</p> <p>Dr. Marlin Bates</p> <p>University of the Pacific</p> <p>Years judging LD: I judged your coaches.</p> <p>Years coaching: I coached your parents.</p> <p>Decision calculus: I will generally decide where and how I am instructed to decide by the debaters themselves. I am generally open to any arguments. However, in my old age, I have determined the following:</p> <ol> <li>This is a communication event. Communicate. Speed is discouraged. I am fully capable of flowing any speed demon. However, I choose not to. </li> <li>Cross-examination is binding & important. You should address your questions and answers to the critic, not each other.</li> <li>Be polite and have fun.</li> </ol> <p>Please begin by explaining what you think is the relevant information about your approach to judging that will best assist the debaters. Please be specific and clear. This may include your background, delivery preferences and general thoughts on paradigms (stock issues, policy maker, tabula rasa, etc).</p> <p>If someone wants to run a procedural, I will evaluate it based on the arguments in the round. As with ALL arguments, I have no pre-existing prejudices.</p> <p>In general, I think critiques discussed at high rates of speed are antithetical both to the event and to the subject matter under discussion, but, as I just said, I have no biases to vote for or against them.</p> <p>Stand up when speaking.</p>
Michael Baumann - Ohio U
n/a
Mike Storr - Miami U
n/a
Nick Garcia - OSU
n/a
Shaunte Caraballo - TSU
n/a
Wendy Larcher - UC
n/a